Does
|
Doesn't
|
Chandler
|
Metz
|
Neale
|
Buckingham
|
Mittell
|
|
Altman
|
|
Abercrombie
|
Conclusion- Our thriller opening, although conforming to many of the typical conventions of a thriller as the genre has developed we followed a more specific take. We created a psychological thriller, this is a sub-genre.
Explanation
|
Evidence
|
Our thriller followed the typical thriller
"genre", by using the conventions which make it obvious as to what
genre it is.
|
Chandler
|
More specifically our thriller is a psychological
thriller, this is conforming to Steve Neale's theory that genres are
processes and therefore develop and evolve over time.
|
Neale- sub genres
|
Mittell says that genres are a way of selling
films to the audience through culture, our thriller personally is aimed at a
general audience. However the conventions we have used are what audiences
will typically understand.
|
Mittell
|
We have tried to apply all the 'pleasures',
emotional, visual and intellectual in our thriller for
the audience to enjoy. Emotionally the audience connect with our main character as it is from her point of view and as a mother figure you feel sympathy for her. Visually we have created a pleasure by the amera editing conforming to the genre conventions. And intellectually we have challenged the audience with the mystery/enigma code of the film.
|
Altman
|
Metz
Stages of genre
1.experimental
2.classic
3.parody
4.deconstruction
|
|
We have followed a sub genre, psychological
thriller, which is a dismantled more specific thriller genre.- Without the detective etc.
|
Abercrombie
|
Genre is constantly changing, however we have
conformed very closely to the typical conventions of thrillers.
|
Buckingham
|
No comments:
Post a Comment